Current:Home > MyFDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men -MarketLink
FDA moves to ease restrictions on blood donations for men who have sex with men
View
Date:2025-04-12 05:04:09
Updated 12:55 p.m. ET
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration issued proposed guidance Friday to ease restrictions on blood donations by men who have sex with men.
The change is expected to take effect after a public comment period.
The restrictions on donating blood date back to the early days of the AIDS epidemic and were designed to protect the blood supply from HIV. Originally, gay and bisexual men were completely prohibited from donating blood. Over time, the FDA relaxed the lifetime ban, but still kept in place some limits.
Under the current policy — last updated in 2020 — men who have sex with men can donate blood if they haven't had sexual contact with other men for three months.
The new proposed policy would eliminate the time-based restrictions on men who have sex with men (and their female partners) and instead screen potential donors' eligibility based on a series of questions that assess their HIV risk, regardless of gender. Anyone taking medications to treat or prevent HIV, including PrEP, would not be eligible.
The risk assessment would include questions about anal sex. Potential donors who've had anal sex in the last three months with a new sexual partner or more than one sexual partner would not be eligible to give blood.
The changes are aimed at addressing criticism that the current policy is discriminatory and outdated, as well as one more barrier to bolstering the nation's blood supply. Blood banks already routinely screen donated blood for HIV.
"We are moving now to an inclusive policy for blood donation," said Dr. Peter Marks, who leads the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research at the FDA during a briefing Friday.
"We will continue to work to make sure that we have policies that allow everyone who wants to donate blood to be able to donate blood within what the science allows to make sure that the blood supply remains safe."
In crafting the new guidance, the FDA has been looking to the results of a study of about 1,600 gay and bisexual men to develop screening questions that can identify potential donors who are most likely to be infected with HIV.
Reaction to the news from advocates, medical groups and blood banks has been positive.
"The blood community is very excited about the proposed changes," says Kate Fry, CEO of America's Blood Centers. "We have advocated for a decade now for a move to an individual risk assessment model. So this is very welcome by blood centers across the country."
She stressed that all donated blood is carefully screened for HIV and that testing has improved dramatically to ensure the safety of the blood supply.
For many years, the American Medical Association, the American Red Cross and LGBTQ+ advocacy groups have pushed for a change to the federal rules on blood donations.
"These changes are 40-plus years in the making and they're a tremendous leap forward in elevating science over stigma," says Tony Morrison, a spokesperson for the advocacy group GLAAD.
But GLAAD and other groups say the changes still don't go far enough. They argue that some of the remaining restrictions are still unnecessary and stigmatizing, such as the prohibition against donations by people taking medication PrEP to prevent HIV.
"When we limit and defer people who are being proactive in their sexual health that stigmatizes them. The misconception is that people on PrEP are promiscuous or have a higher risk of HIV infection — that's categorically false," says Morrison.
So his group will continue to lobby the FDA to further ease restrictions.
The proposed changes in the blood donation rules will be open for public comment for 60 days. The FDA will then review those comments and issue a final rule, probably later this year. So monogamous gay men could start donating blood again sometime in 2023.
veryGood! (9)
Related
- Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
- Pennsylvania prison officials warned of 'escape risk' before Danelo Cavalcante breakout
- UN to vote on Gaza resolution that would condemn attack by Hamas and all violence against civilians
- Why the tunnels under Gaza pose a problem for Israel
- New Mexico governor seeks funding to recycle fracking water, expand preschool, treat mental health
- Cleanup cost for nuclear contamination sites has risen nearly $1 billion since 2016, report says
- Julianne Hough Is Joining Dancing With the Stars Tour and the Details Will Have You Spinning
- Marine veteran says he was arrested, charged after Hertz falsely accused him of stealing rental car: It was hell
- What to watch: O Jolie night
- As Walter Isaacson and Michael Lewis wrote, their books' heroes became villains
Ranking
- The Louvre will be renovated and the 'Mona Lisa' will have her own room
- Prison guard warned that Danilo Cavalcante planned escape a month before he fled, emails show
- Towboat owner pleads guilty to pollution charge in oil spill along West Virginia-Kentucky border
- Gaza carnage spreads anger across Mideast, alarming US allies and threatening to widen conflict
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Prosecutors seeking to recharge Alec Baldwin in fatal shooting on set of Western movie ‘Rust’
- Jax Taylor Reveals He’s in “Contract Negotiations” With Brittany for Baby No. 2
- Legal challenge to dethrone South Africa’s Zulu king heads to court
Recommendation
Macy's says employee who allegedly hid $150 million in expenses had no major 'impact'
Georgia deputy fatally shoots 'kind' man who served 16 years for wrongful conviction
Justice Amy Coney Barrett says it would be a good idea for Supreme Court to adopt ethics rules
Deadly attack in Belgium ignites fierce debate on failures of deportation policy
Pressure on a veteran and senator shows what’s next for those who oppose Trump
Millie Bobby Brown credits her feminist awakening to a psychic
Russian President Putin insists Ukraine’s new US-supplied weapon won’t change the war’s outcome
Supreme Court orders makers of gun parts to comply with federal ghost gun rules