Current:Home > ScamsCourt battle begins over Missouri’s ban on gender-affirming health care for minors -MarketLink
Court battle begins over Missouri’s ban on gender-affirming health care for minors
Johnathan Walker View
Date:2025-04-10 08:27:20
SPRINGFIELD, Mo. (AP) — Missouri’s Republican Attorney General Andrew Bailey and the families of transgender children are in court this week fighting over whether a new law banning minors from receiving gender-affirming health care will take effect as scheduled Monday.
Lawyers last month sued to overturn the law on behalf of three families of transgender minors, doctors and two LGBTQ+ organizations. They asked a county judge to temporarily block the law as the court challenge against it plays out.
Hearings over pausing the law are taking place this week in Springfield. A judge is expected to rule before Monday.
THE LAW
The law, signed by Republican Gov. Mike Parson in June, would prohibit Missouri health care providers from providing puberty blockers, hormones and gender-affirming surgeries to minors. Minors prescribed puberty blockers or hormones before Aug. 28 would be able to continue to receive those treatments.
Missouri’s Planned Parenthood clinics had been ramping up available appointments and holding pop-up clinics to start patients on treatments before the law takes effect.
Most adults would still have access to transgender health care under the law, but Medicaid wouldn’t cover it and prisoners’ access to surgeries would be limited.
Physicians who violate the law face having their licenses revoked and being sued by patients. The law makes it easier for former patients to sue, giving them 15 years to go to court and promising at least $500,000 in damages if they succeed.
The law expires in August 2027.
LEGAL ARGUMENTS
Lawyers for the plaintiffs’ wrote in a court filing that the law unlawfully discriminates against transgender patients “by denying them medically necessary care and insurance coverage because of their sex and because of their transgender status.”
In court briefs, the Attorney General’s Office argued that the law is not discriminatory because it “applies evenly to boys and girls.”
“The only distinction made is based on the condition to be treated,” lawyers for the office wrote. “Puberty blockers, testosterone, and estrogen can all still be used to treat various conditions (such as precocious puberty). They just cannot be used as an experimental response to gender dysphoria.”
WHAT HEALTH CARE PROVIDERS SAY
The Food and Drug Administration approved puberty blockers 30 years ago to treat children with precocious puberty — a condition that causes sexual development to begin much earlier than usual. Sex hormones — synthetic forms of estrogen and testosterone — were approved decades ago to treat hormone disorders or as birth control pills.
The FDA has not approved the medications specifically to treat gender-questioning youth, but they have been used for many years for that purpose “off label,” a common and accepted practice for many medical conditions. Doctors who treat trans patients say those decades of use are proof that the treatments are not experimental.
Every major medical organization, including the American Medical Association, has opposed the bans on gender-affirming care for minors and supported the medical care for youth when administered appropriately. Lawsuits have been filed in several states where bans have been enacted this year.
veryGood! (6)
Related
- Former Danish minister for Greenland discusses Trump's push to acquire island
- Kareem Abdul-Jabbar falls and breaks hip at Los Angeles concert
- Agave is an increasingly popular substitute for honey and sugar. But is it healthy?
- Lions on brink of first playoff appearance since 2016 after blasting Broncos
- Biden administration makes final diplomatic push for stability across a turbulent Mideast
- A Black woman miscarried at home and was charged for it. It shows the perils of pregnancy post-Roe
- Patrick Dempsey Makes Rare Appearance With All 3 Kids on Red Carpet
- Dodgers, Ohtani got creative with $700 million deal, but both sides still have some risk
- Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
- There's still time (barely) to consolidate student loans for a shot at debt forgiveness
Ranking
- Paris Hilton, Nicole Richie return for an 'Encore,' reminisce about 'The Simple Life'
- Fletcher Loyer, Braden Smith shoot Purdue men's basketball over No. 1 Arizona
- Browns DE Myles Garrett fined $25,000 by NFL for criticizing officials after game
- Putin supporters formally nominate him as independent candidate in Russian presidential election
- Selena Gomez engaged to Benny Blanco after 1 year together: 'Forever begins now'
- Goodreads has a 'review bombing' problem — and wants its users to help solve it
- Mega Millions winning numbers for Dec. 15 drawing; Jackpot at $28 million
- These 18 Great Gifts Have Guaranteed Christmas Delivery & They're All on Sale
Recommendation
Krispy Kreme offers a free dozen Grinch green doughnuts: When to get the deal
Dodgers, Ohtani got creative with $700 million deal, but both sides still have some risk
Fire destroys a Los Angeles-area church just before Christmas
Prince Harry was victim of phone hacking by U.K. tabloids, court rules
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
'Wait Wait' for December 16, 2023: Live at Carnegie with Bethenny Frankel
Boston Tea Party turns 250 years old with reenactments of the revolutionary protest
'Friends' star Matthew Perry's cause of death revealed in autopsy report